Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 23be700e-341b-65ee-231e-282c38013068@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/10/2017 08:27 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> For me a killer feature would be if/when we can get to a point where we can
> have something pgxs-style on cmake that also works on windows.
>
> Our homemade Windows build system works OK for postgres, and while ugly it
> is as you say well tested by now. But it doesn't do *anything* to help
> people build extensions on Windows.

Do we need to build PostgreSQL itself using cmake, to achieve that? 
Could we write something like pgxs for cmake, only for extensions?

- Heikki




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2