Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id 23590.1468255269@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I agree with removing the source code field, though I did like the
> suggestion mentioned elsewhere for having it shown when it's just a C
> symbol but not otherwise.  If we can find a way to have the C symbol
> shown when it's a C or internal function, I'm fine with that, but the
> source code field having entier pl/sql and pl/pgsql functions in it
> doesn't work and \sf should be used instead.

It would certainly be easy enough to do that, as long as you don't mind
hard-wiring into psql the knowledge that "internal" and "C" are the
languages to show prosrc for.  "Source code" would no longer be a very
appropriate column name, though it already was not for these cases.
I'd be inclined to call it "Internal name" instead.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: remove checkpoint_warning