Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id 20160711214947.GO4028@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
List pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > I agree with removing the source code field, though I did like the
> > suggestion mentioned elsewhere for having it shown when it's just a C
> > symbol but not otherwise.  If we can find a way to have the C symbol
> > shown when it's a C or internal function, I'm fine with that, but the
> > source code field having entier pl/sql and pl/pgsql functions in it
> > doesn't work and \sf should be used instead.
>
> It would certainly be easy enough to do that, as long as you don't mind
> hard-wiring into psql the knowledge that "internal" and "C" are the
> languages to show prosrc for.  "Source code" would no longer be a very
> appropriate column name, though it already was not for these cases.
> I'd be inclined to call it "Internal name" instead.

That would certainly work for me.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST index build versus NaN coordinates
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: remove checkpoint_warning