Re: Why does this query write to the disk? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why does this query write to the disk?
Date
Msg-id 23587.1221761600@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why does this query write to the disk?  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Why does this query write to the disk?  ("Scott Carey" <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Re: Why does this query write to the disk?  ("Nikolas Everett" <nik9000@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> "Nikolas Everett" <nik9000@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused as to why this query writes to the disk:

> It's probably writing hint bits to improve performance of subsequent
> access to the table.  The issue is discussed here:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Hint_Bits

Hint-bit updates wouldn't be WAL-logged.  If the table has been around a
long time, it might be freezing old tuples, which *would* be WAL-logged
(since 8.2 or so) --- but that would be a one-time, non-repeatable
behavior.  How sure are you that there was WAL output?

What I was thinking was more likely was that the hash table for the hash
join was spilling out to temp files.  That wouldn't be WAL-logged
either, but depending on your tablespace setup it might result in I/O on
some other disk than the table proper.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does this query write to the disk?
Next
From: "Scott Carey"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does this query write to the disk?