Re: daitch_mokotoff module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Date
Msg-id 233e19c9-6819-ca0f-5314-f5f9285ac874@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: daitch_mokotoff module  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: daitch_mokotoff module
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/13/21 09:26, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/13/21 14:38, Dag Lem wrote:
>> Please find attached an updated patch, with the following fixes:
>>
>> * Replaced remaining malloc/free with palloc/pfree.
>> * Made "make check" pass.
>> * Updated notes on other implementations.
>>
>
> Thanks, looks interesting. A couple generic comments, based on a quick
> code review.
>
> 1) Can the extension be marked as trusted, just like fuzzystrmatch?
>
> 2) The docs really need an explanation of what the extension is for,
> not just a link to fuzzystrmatch. Also, a couple examples would be
> helpful, I guess - similarly to fuzzystrmatch. The last line in the
> docs is annoyingly long.


It's not clear to me why we need a new module for this. Wouldn't it be
better just to add the new function to fuzzystrmatch?


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects