Re: daitch_mokotoff module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Date
Msg-id e2c26668-79c5-49ca-cf84-770b1d3fed6b@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: daitch_mokotoff module  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/13/21 16:05, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 12/13/21 09:26, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 12/13/21 14:38, Dag Lem wrote:
>>> Please find attached an updated patch, with the following fixes:
>>>
>>> * Replaced remaining malloc/free with palloc/pfree.
>>> * Made "make check" pass.
>>> * Updated notes on other implementations.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, looks interesting. A couple generic comments, based on a quick
>> code review.
>>
>> 1) Can the extension be marked as trusted, just like fuzzystrmatch?
>>
>> 2) The docs really need an explanation of what the extension is for,
>> not just a link to fuzzystrmatch. Also, a couple examples would be
>> helpful, I guess - similarly to fuzzystrmatch. The last line in the
>> docs is annoyingly long.
> 
> 
> It's not clear to me why we need a new module for this. Wouldn't it be
> better just to add the new function to fuzzystrmatch?
> 

Yeah, that's a valid point. I think we're quite conservative about 
adding more contrib modules, and adding a function to an existing one 
works around a lot of that.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: speed up text_position() for utf-8
Next
From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Date:
Subject: Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations