On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 for removing that where possible. We generally have avoided such
>> names at SQL level. (The C-level function names need such prefixes to
>> be unique, but the SQL names don't.)
>>
>> In the cases where one or more arguments are anyelement, however, we may
>> need to be more specific to avoid ambiguity problems in future. I agree
>> with Josh's objections to record(), row() etc. to_record() and
>> to_recordset() might be OK.
Agreed on all counts. (Wow!)
> !
Not sure this would make a useful operator. Maybe for exists()? :-O
David
