Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Date
Msg-id 2320c2f603642bf0c4fdd57c30077a37.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Pavel,

In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in polymorphic functions),
where the function name is concat():  (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic SQL Functions).
Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when concat goes into
core, as seems to be the plan.

If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change that example
function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied.


Erik Rijkers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1