Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 July 2010

• 00:25   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane
• 00:51   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Jeff Davis
• 01:24   Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output Florian Pflug
• 06:56   Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Jaime Casanova
• 08:58   Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Simon Riggs
• 09:15   Re: [JDBC] Trouble with COPY IN Matthew Wakeling
• 11:03   Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov
• 11:04   patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Henk Enting
• 11:56   Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 13:10   Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas
• 13:22   review: xml_is_well_formed Pavel Stehule
• 14:03   Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas
• 15:09   Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane
• 15:12   Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 15:41   Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function Alexander Korotkov
• 15:41   Re: **[SPAM]*(8.2)** Re: Query optimization problem Zotov
• 15:46   Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week one progress report Kevin Grittner
• 16:03   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov
• 16:17   Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas
• 16:28   Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Pavel Stehule
• 17:00   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 17:06   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Robert Haas
• 17:09   On Scalability Vincenzo Romano
• 17:10   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane
• 17:12   Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake
• 17:20   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Robert Haas
• 17:35   Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano
• 17:40   Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake
• 17:52   Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano
• 18:17   Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake
• 18:35   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 19:29   Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Robert Haas
• 20:10   Re: On Scalability Josh Berkus
• 20:16   Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function Robert Haas
• 20:37   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions Erik Rijkers
• 20:45   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 20:49   Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached ) Erik Rijkers
• 20:51   Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas
• 21:03   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas
• 21:30   Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano
• 21:35   Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs Tom Lane
• 23:56   review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Kevin Grittner