Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
Date
Msg-id 22895.1352830571@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I was imagining writing single, specific settings, which inevitably
> leads to one-setting-per-file, e.g.:

> SET PERSISTENT work_mem = 256MB;

> What Amit seems to be talking about is more EXPORT SETTINGS, where you
> dump all current settings in the session to a file.  This seems likely
> to produce accidental changes when the user writes out settings they've
> forgotten they changed.

Yeah.  It also seems to be unnecessarily different from the existing
model of SET.  I'd go with one-setting-per-command.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Inadequate thought about buffer locking during hot standby replay