Re: Status of server side Large Object support? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Status of server side Large Object support?
Date
Msg-id 22832.1101689827@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Status of server side Large Object support?  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com> writes:
> I find it nonintuitive and hard to remember. Perhaps something like this 
> is better (I know, it's probably too late):

>   ALTER [ COLUMN ] column SET STORAGE { INLINE | EXTERNAL }
>   ALTER [ COLUMN ] column SET COMPRESSION { YES | NO }

The semantics are not simply two independent variables, however.
In particular, IIRC the precedence of different possible actions
is such that you couldn't cleanly express it that way.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Garamond
Date:
Subject: Re: Status of server side Large Object support?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...