Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy
Date
Msg-id 2215dc56-5bbc-a15d-8945-867952798946@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23/02/17 01:02, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-02-22 18:13, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On 2017-02-22 14:48, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>> On 2017-02-22 13:03, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>>> 0001-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch
>>>> 0002-Don-t-use-on-disk-snapshots-for-snapshot-export-in-l.patch
>>>> 0003-Fix-xl_running_xacts-usage-in-snapshot-builder.patch
>>>> 0001-Use-asynchronous-connect-API-in-libpqwalreceiver.patch
>>>> 0002-Fix-after-trigger-execution-in-logical-replication.patch
>>>> 0003-Add-RENAME-support-for-PUBLICATIONs-and-SUBSCRIPTION.patch
>>>> 0001-Logical-replication-support-for-initial-data-copy-v5.patch
>>>
>>> It works well now, or at least my particular test case seems now solved.
>>
>> Cried victory too early, I'm afraid.
>>
> 
> I got into a 'hung' state while repeating  pgbench_derail2.sh.
> 
> Below is some state.  I notice that master pg_stat_replication.syaye is
> 'startup'.
> Maybe I should only start the test after that state has changed. Any of the
> other possible values (catchup, streaming) wuold be OK, I would think.
> 

I think that's known issue (see comment in tablesync.c about hanging
forever). I think I may have fixed it locally.

I will submit patch once I fixed the other snapshot issue (I managed to
reproduce it as well, although very rarely so it's rather hard to test).

Thanks for all this testing btw, I really appreciate it.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WARM and indirect indexes