Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 22144.1484063715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm not meaning to be funny or sarcastic or disrespectful when I say
> that I think C is the best possible language for PostgreSQL.  It works
> great, and we've got a ton of investment in making it work.

Yeah.  There's certainly a whole lot of path dependency in that statement
--- if you were starting to write Postgres from scratch today, you would
very likely choose some other language.  But given where we are, there's
just not a lot of attraction in trying to convert to another language.

As other people noted, the one path that might possibly make sense is
a gradual upgrade to C++.  But getting past the exceptions issue is a
pretty high bar that we'd have to clear before we could do much in
that direction; and it's not obvious that C++ would offer enough benefit
to be worth it.  Most of us would rather spend our time on new features
or performance improvements, not fighting with a language changeover.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage