Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZM9EPfsNtBcSjY2RD4Ys3t0uTXtzFDDuME7_-XWH1UpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore,
>> but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though,
>> particularly for offline reading or loading them in ebook readers. So it
>> still has to be workable there.
>
> PDFs do have hyperlinks, so that in itself isn't an argument for keeping
> the dead-tree-friendly approach.  However, I've noticed some variation
> among tools in whether a PDF hyperlink is visibly distinct, or whether
> you have to mouse over it to find out that it would take you somewhere.
> Not sure if that's enough of a usability fail to argue for keeping the
> old way.

Personally, I wouldn't sweat it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL