Re: Bogus bind() warnings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bogus bind() warnings
Date
Msg-id 21892.1068149278@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bogus bind() warnings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Bogus bind() warnings
Re: Bogus bind() warnings
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> When I start up with -i, I get the following log:
> LOG:  could not bind IPv4 socket: Address already in use

> There is no other postmaster running anywhere.  I suspect that this has to
> do with IPv6.  This is a SuSE 8.something machine that is relatively fully
> IPv6 enabled.

Is it possible that that kernel considers binding to an IPv6 port to
conflict with binding to the "same" port number as an IPv4 port?

IIRC that was the behavior we once expected would happen, but later
found out that most kernels don't (yet?) act that way.  The present
design of trying to bind to both IPv6 and IPv4 sockets would be
unnecessary if the kernels acted more rationally.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Bogus bind() warnings
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List