Oliver Ford <ojford@gmail.com> writes:
> On Monday, 13 November 2017, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I don't follow your concern? If "$" is not the correct currency
>> symbol for the locale, we shouldn't accept it as a match to an L format.
>> Your patch is tightening what we will accept as a match to a G format,
>> so I don't see why you're concerned about backward compatibility in
>> one case but not the other.
> It's a guess as to the likely use case. I would imagine that people are
> likely to use a currency symbol different from the locale, but unlikely to
> use a different group separator. Others might have a different opinion
> though.
Well, if they use a currency symbol different from the locale's, they're
in trouble anyway because the number of bytes might be different. In most
encodings, symbols other than "$" are probably not 1-byte characters.
At the very least I think we need to constrain it enough that it not
swallow a fractional character.
regards, tom lane
