Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date
Msg-id 21193.1392241323@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>>> Would that be affected by this?

> It works reasonably well on other platforms.

> Of course, we can barely build extension modules on Windows, so maybe
> this is a bit much to ask.  But as long as we're dealing only with
> functions, not variables, it should work without any dllimport dances,
> right?

AFAIK we've not changed anything that would affect that.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)