Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date
Msg-id 20532.1534872560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> So, does anyone with Windows build experience want to comment on this?
> The proposal is to desupport anything older than (probably) MSVC 2013,
> or alternatively anything that cannot compile the attached test file.

We've got a buildfarm handy that could answer the question.
Let's just stick a test function in there for a day and see
which animals fail.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexandra Ryzhevich
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add regress test for pg_read_all_stats role
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)