Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brian Maguire
Subject Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Date
Msg-id 203C7FC3FF2D7A4588CE0429A87F3C9A0AC3B5@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL v7.4 Released  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-general
And all along I thought "v" stood for "victory" we launched 7.4!   Seriously huge effort, great product, cheers!
Anothergreat milestone.
 
 
Cheers to the veam, I mean team.
 
 
 
 

    -----Original Message----- 
    From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] 
    Sent: Mon 11/17/2003 9:10 PM 
    To: Joshua D. Drake 
    Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-general@postgresql.org 
    Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
    
    

    Joshua D. Drake writes: 

    > Somebody please explain to me what the hell a difference it makes if 
    > we have a v in front of the version number? 

    Packaging tools, packaging standards, convention, consistency of public 
    presentation. 

    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net 


    ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- 
    TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your 
          joining column's datatypes do not match 


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released