Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Date
Msg-id 20031117222406.E731@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake writes:
>
> > Somebody please explain to me what the hell a difference it makes if
> > we have a v in front of the version number?
>
> Packaging tools, packaging standards, convention, consistency of public
> presentation.

Packaging has always been straight:

svr1# ls -l */postgresql-7.?.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r--  1 pgsql  pgsql   9173732 May  9  2000 v7.0/postgresql-7.0.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 pgsql  pgsql   8088678 Apr 13  2001 v7.1/postgresql-7.1.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 pgsql  pgsql   9180168 Feb  4  2002 v7.2/postgresql-7.2.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 pgsql  pgsql  11059455 Nov 27  2002 v7.3/postgresql-7.3.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--  1 pgsql  pgsql  12311256 Nov 16 17:57 v7.4/postgresql-7.4.tar.gz

Its just in the text/subjects that I put the v ... *shrug*

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Brian Maguire"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Next
From: Oliver Elphick
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released