Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Date
Msg-id 1069122440.16544.281.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 01:55, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Somebody please explain to me what the hell a difference it makes if
> we have a v in front of the version number?

It isn't standard practice.  I agree with Peter on this.

Also, as I have asked before, please make sure that future releases sort
in the correct order.  It makes life much easier for those of us who
make packages and the many users who install packages.

The cycle of releases we have had were:
7.4beta[1-5]
7.4RC[12]
7.4

These sort in reverse (ASCII) order to their real priority.

So the series of Debian packages were numbered:
7.3.99.7.4beta[1-5]
7.3.99.7.4rc[12]
7.4

I hope users who were tracking these understood the relationship between
Marc's numbers and mine.

--
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                             http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "A Song for the sabbath day. It is a good thing to
      give thanks unto the LORD, and to sing praises unto
      thy name, O most High."   Psalms 92:1


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: tracking down temp files