Re: More message encoding woes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: More message encoding woes
Date
Msg-id 20389.1238435084@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More message encoding woes  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: More message encoding woes
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Where does it get the default codeset from?  Maybe we could constrain
>> that to match the database encoding, the way we do for LC_COLLATE/CTYPE?

> LC_CTYPE. In 8.3 and up where we constrain that to match the database 
> encoding, we only have a problem with the C locale.

... and even if we wanted to fiddle with it, that just moves the problem
over to finding an LC_CTYPE value that matches the database encoding
:-(.

Yup, it's a mess.  We'd have done this long ago if it were easy.

Could we get away with just unconditionally calling
bind_textdomain_codeset with *our* canonical spelling of the encoding
name?  If it works, great, and if it doesn't, you get English.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf