Re: More message encoding woes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: More message encoding woes
Date
Msg-id 49D105CE.5010705@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More message encoding woes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: More message encoding woes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Where does it get the default codeset from?  Maybe we could constrain
>>> that to match the database encoding, the way we do for LC_COLLATE/CTYPE?
> 
>> LC_CTYPE. In 8.3 and up where we constrain that to match the database 
>> encoding, we only have a problem with the C locale.
> 
> ... and even if we wanted to fiddle with it, that just moves the problem
> over to finding an LC_CTYPE value that matches the database encoding
> :-(.
> 
> Yup, it's a mess.  We'd have done this long ago if it were easy.
> 
> Could we get away with just unconditionally calling
> bind_textdomain_codeset with *our* canonical spelling of the encoding
> name?  If it works, great, and if it doesn't, you get English.

Yeah, that's better than nothing.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf