Re: Inconsistency between attname of index and attname of relation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inconsistency between attname of index and attname of relation
Date
Msg-id 2032.1562336531@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Inconsistency between attname of index and attname of relation  (Ronan Dunklau <ronan_dunklau@ultimatesoftware.com>)
Responses Re: Inconsistency between attname of index and attname of relation  (Ronan Dunklau <ronan_dunklau@ultimatesoftware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ronan Dunklau <ronan_dunklau@ultimatesoftware.com> writes:
> I've noticed that renaming an indexed column produces inconsistencies in
> the catalog. Namely, the attname of the attribute of the relation is
> properly updated, whereas the attname of the attribute in the index is not,
> and keeps the old value.

If memory serves, we used to try to rename index columns, and gave up
on that because it caused problems of its own.  That's (one reason) why
modern versions of psql show a "definition" column in \d of an index.

> I think this could be considered a bug in Postgres.

It is not.

> If it isn't, what
> should be the proper way to retrieve this information ?

psql uses pg_get_indexdef(), looks like.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version()