Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yugo Nagata
Subject Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it?
Date
Msg-id 20240805160502.d2a4975802a832b1e04afb80@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it?  (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:13:01 +0900
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 11:31:53 -0700
> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2024-07-31 at 18:20 +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> > > I agree that it might not be important, but I think adding the flag
> > > would be
> > > also helpful for improving code-readability because it clarify the
> > > function
> > > is used in the two cases. I attached patch for this fix (patch 0003).
> > 
> > Committed with one minor modification: I moved the boolean flag to be
> > near the other booleans rather than at the end. Thank you.
> > 
> > > Sure. I fixed the patch to remove 'param' from both functions. (patch
> > > 0002)
> > 
> > Committed, thank you.
> 
> Thank you for committing them.
> Should not they be backported to REL_17_STABLE?
> 
> > 
> > > I also add the small refactoring around ExecCreateTableAs(). (patch
> > > 0001)
> > > 
> > > - Remove matview-related codes from intorel_startup.
> > >   Materialized views are no longer handled in this function.
> > > 
> > > - RefreshMatViewByOid is moved to just after create_ctas_nodata
> > >   call to improve code readability.
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm not sure the changes in intorel_startup() are correct. I tried
> > adding an Assert(into->viewQuery == NULL), and it fails because there's
> > another path I did not consider: "EXPLAIN ANALYZE CREATE MATERIALIZED
> > VIEW ...", which does not go through ExecCreateTableAs() but does go
> > through CreateIntoRelDestReceiver().
> > 
> > See:
> > 
> > https://postgr.es/m/20444c382e6cb5e21e93c94d679d0198b0dba4dd.camel@j-davis.com
> > 
> > Should we refactor a bit and try to make EXPLAIN use the same code
> > paths?
> 
> I overlooked that CreateIntoRelDestReceiver() is used from EXPLAIN. I saw the
> thread above and I agree that we should refactor it to make EXPLAIN consistent
> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW, but I suppose this should be discussed the other thread.
> 
> I attached a updated patch removed the intorel_startup() part from.

I confirmed that this has been committed to the master branch.
Thank you!

I also noticed that the documentation of CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW doesn't mention
search_path while it also changes search_path since it uses the REFRESH logic.
I attached a trivial patch to fix this.

Regards,
Yugo Nagata


-- 
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable cumulative statistics
Next
From: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Set query_id for query contained in utility statement