Hi,
On 2023-04-07 17:19:42 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2023-04-07%2021%3A16%3A04
> might point out a problem with the pg_dump or pg_upgrade backward compat
> paths:
>
> --- C:\\prog\\bf/root/upgrade.drongo/HEAD/origin-REL9_5_STABLE.sql.fixed 2023-04-07 23:51:27.641328600 +0000
> +++ C:\\prog\\bf/root/upgrade.drongo/HEAD/converted-REL9_5_STABLE-to-HEAD.sql.fixed 2023-04-07 23:51:27.672571900
+0000
> @@ -416,9 +416,9 @@
> -- Name: entry; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: buildfarm
> --
> CREATE TABLE public.entry (
> - accession text,
> - eid integer,
> - txid smallint
> + accession text NOT NULL,
> + eid integer NOT NULL,
> + txid smallint NOT NULL
> );
> ALTER TABLE public.entry OWNER TO buildfarm;
> --
>
> Looks like we're making up NOT NULL constraints when migrating from 9.5, for
> some reason?
My compiler complains:
../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/catalog/heap.c: In function ‘AddRelationNotNullConstraints’:
../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/catalog/heap.c:2829:37: warning: ‘conname’ may be used uninitialized
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
2829 | if (strcmp(lfirst(lc2), conname) == 0)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/catalog/heap.c:2802:29: note: ‘conname’ was declared here
2802 | char *conname;
| ^~~~~~~
I think the compiler may be right - I think the first use of conname might
have been intended as constr->conname?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
