Hi,
On 2022-08-30 08:48:38 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:12:20AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have noticed that yesterday, but cannot think much about it. This
> > basically changes the position of "<!--c1-->" for the first record,
> > leaving the second one untouched:
> > <!--c1--><?pi arg?><![CDATA[&ent1]]>
> > <?pi arg?><![CDATA[&ent1]]><!--c1-->
> >
> > I am not used to xmltable(), but I wonder if there is something in one
> > of these support functions in xml.c that gets influenced by the
> > randomization. That sounds a bit hairy as make check passed in
> > bowerbird, and I have noticed at least two other Windows hosts running
> > TAP that passed. Or that's just something with libxml itself.
>
> This is amazing. The issue has showed up a second time in a row in
> bowerbird, as of:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2022-08-29%2013%3A30%3A32
>
> I don't know what to think about ASLR that manipulates the comment in
> this XML object under VS 2017 (perhaps a compiler issue?), but it
> should be possible to go back to green simply by removing "<!--c1-->"
> from the input string. Creating an extra output pattern here would be
> very costly, as xml_2.out and xml.out have outputs for --with-libxml.
>
> Would people object if I do that for now?
I do. Clearly something is wrong, what do we gain by averting our eyes? An
alternative output file strikes me as an equally bad idea - it's not like this
is a case where there are legitimately different outputs?
Bowerbird is the only animal testing libxml with visual studio afaics. And CI
doesn't have libxml either. So we have no idea if it's the msvc version that
matters.
Andrew, what version of libxml is installed? Afaict we don't see that anywhere
with msvc.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
