Today, I see some error messages have been added, two of which look
somewhat inconsistent.
commands/user.c
@707:
> errmsg("must have admin option on role \"%s\" to add members",
@1971:
> errmsg("grantor must have ADMIN OPTION on \"%s\"",
A grep'ing told me that the latter above is the only outlier among 6
occurrences in total of "admin option/ADMIN OPTION".
Don't we unify them? I slightly prefer "ADMIN OPTION" but no problem
with them being in small letters. (Attached).
In passing, I met the following code in the same file.
> if (!have_createrole_privilege() &&
> !is_admin_of_role(currentUserId, roleid))
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
> errmsg("must have admin option on role \"%s\"",
> rolename)));
The message seems a bit short that it only mentions admin option while
omitting CREATEROLE privilege. "must have CREATEROLE privilege or
admin option on role %s" might be better. Or we could say just
"insufficient privilege" or "permission denied" in the main error
message then provide "CREATEROLE privilege or admin option on role %s
is required" in DETAILS or HINTS message. The message was added by
c33d575899 along with the have_createrole_privilege() call so it is
unclear to me whether it is intentional or not.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
