>>> Or those three columns always, sum_lag sum_lag_2, min_lag max_lag,
>>> skipped, retried retries?
>>
>> What about this? (a log line is not actually folded)
>> interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency
>> max_latency
>> failures serialization_failures deadlock_failures retried retries [
>> sum_lag sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ]
>
> My 0.02€:
>
> I agree that it would be better to have a more deterministic
> aggregated log format.
>
> ISTM that it should skip failures and lags if no fancy options has
> been selected, i.e.:
>
> [ fails ... retries [ sum_lag ... [ skipped ] ] ?
>
> Alterlatively, as the failure stuff is added to the format, maybe it
> could be at the end:
>
> [ sum_lag ... [ skipped [ fails ... retries ] ] ] ?
I like this one.
interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency max_latency
[sum_lag sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped [
failures serialization_failures deadlock_failures retried retries ] ] ]
Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
