>> Or those three columns always, sum_lag sum_lag_2, min_lag max_lag,
>> skipped, retried retries?
>
> What about this? (a log line is not actually folded)
> interval_start num_transactions sum_latency sum_latency_2 min_latency max_latency
> failures serialization_failures deadlock_failures retried retries [ sum_lag sum_lag_2 min_lag max_lag [ skipped ] ]
My 0.02€:
I agree that it would be better to have a more deterministic
aggregated log format.
ISTM that it should skip failures and lags if no fancy options has been
selected, i.e.:
[ fails ... retries [ sum_lag ... [ skipped ] ] ?
Alterlatively, as the failure stuff is added to the format, maybe it could
be at the end:
[ sum_lag ... [ skipped [ fails ... retries ] ] ] ?
> failures:
> always 0 (if --max-tries is 1, the default)
> sum of serialization_failures and deadlock_failures (if --max-tries is not 1)
>
> serialization_failures and deadlock_failures:
> always 0 (if --max-tries is 1, the default)
> 0 or more (if --max-tries is not 1)
>
> retried and retries:
> always 0 (if --max-tries is 1, the default)
> 0 or more (if --max-tries is not 1)
>
> Best reagards,
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>
--
Fabien.