Hi,
On 2022-03-26 17:04:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, looks like the gcc folk aren't too sure either ;-).
Heh, yea ;)
> Okay, so we can change this code, or just do nothing and wait for
> a repaired gcc. Since that's an unreleased version there's no
> concern about any possible bug in-the-wild. I think it probably
> should come down to whether we think the predecrement form is
> indeed more readable.
Agreed.
> I'm about +0.1 towards changing, what do you think?
Similar.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
