Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset
Date
Msg-id 20220302.172235.1181597714315490061.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:46:01 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in 
> Hi all,
> 
> In my hunt looking for incorrect SRFs, I have noticed a new case of a
> system function marked as proretset while it builds and returns only
> one record.  And this is a popular one: pg_stop_backup(), labelled
> v2.
> 
> This leads to a lot of unnecessary work, as the function creates a
> tuplestore it has no need for with the usual set of checks related to
> SRFs.  The logic can be be simplified as of the attached.
> 
> Thoughts?

That direction seems find to me.

But the patch forgets to remove an useless variable.

>    /* Initialise attributes information in the tuple descriptor */
>    tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(PG_STOP_BACKUP_V2_COLS);
>    TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 1, "lsn",
>                       PG_LSNOID, -1, 0);

I think we can use get_call_resuilt_type here.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks