On 2021-Oct-21, Michael Paquier wrote:
> There is already an assumption in walsender.c where an invalid
> timeline is 0, by the way? See sendTimeLineNextTLI and sendTimeLine.
> Asserting here and there looks like a good thing to do for code paths
> where the timeline should, or should not, be set.
Sure, but as Robert suggested, let's make that value a known and obvious
constant InvalidTimeLineId rather than magic value 0.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not
crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by
the Conservation of Cruft Principle." (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)
