Re: Some leftovers of recent message cleanup? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Some leftovers of recent message cleanup?
Date
Msg-id 20210825.105019.1284595048560508172.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some leftovers of recent message cleanup?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Some leftovers of recent message cleanup?
List pgsql-hackers
At Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:05:25 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in 
> 
> 
> On 2021/08/23 15:27, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > So this patch is meaningful only for v13 and later, too. Not sure what
> > to do for v12 and earlier but doesn't seem to be in much necessity.
> 
> Probably I failed to get your point... I was thinking that
> your 0001 patch can be back-patched to v11. And also
> the attached patch can be applied to v10 and v9.6. If we do this,
> the log messages can be consistent between versions.
> But you think that we should not change the log messages
> in v12 or before, for some reasons?

Sigh.  The message of partbounds.c of v11,12 cited there was just
wrong.  So, you're right that it is simply applicable to v11 and
later.  Sorry for the confusion.

> I pushed your 0002 patch. Thanks!

Thanks for committing!

regares.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: pgstat_send_connstats() introduces unnecessary timestamp and UDP overhead
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Separate out FileSet from SharedFileSet (was Re: pgsql: pgstat: Bring up pgstat in BaseInit() to fix uninitialized use o)