Re: Partition column should be part of PK - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Date
Msg-id 202107082228.obnak7c7mx4n@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partition column should be part of PK  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses RE: Partition column should be part of PK  ("Mike Sofen" <msofen@runbox.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 2021-Jul-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> If I'm not wrong, this is the same thing you asked 2 week ago.
> 
> If so, why not continue the conversation on the same thread, and why not
> reference the old thread ?
> 
> I went to the effort to find the old conversation.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210625042228.GJ29179@telsasoft.com

Actually, it looks like you're replying to the same email you replied to
two weeks ago.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Next
From: "Mike Sofen"
Date:
Subject: RE: Partition column should be part of PK