RE: Partition column should be part of PK - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mike Sofen
Subject RE: Partition column should be part of PK
Date
Msg-id 080901d7744e$ac0f3d70$042db850$@runbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partition column should be part of PK  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Partition column should be part of PK  (Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-performance
I believe this thread qualifies for the funniest thread of 2021 (so far).  And yes, this is a top post.  :-)

Mike Sofen

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2021 3:29 PM
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK

On 2021-Jul-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> If I'm not wrong, this is the same thing you asked 2 week ago.
>
> If so, why not continue the conversation on the same thread, and why
> not reference the old thread ?
>
> I went to the effort to find the old conversation.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210625042228.GJ29179@telsasoft
> .com

Actually, it looks like you're replying to the same email you replied to two weeks ago.

--
Álvaro Herrera              Valdivia, Chile  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/






pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Next
From: Manuel Weitzman
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange execution plan