Re: cutting down the TODO list thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Date
Msg-id 20210702012332.GD3618@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Re: cutting down the TODO list thread  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 05:41:50PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> Here I'm just reviewing a couple items in the Sorting section:
> 
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Sorting
> 
> - Consider whether duplicate keys should be sorted by block/offset
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/23321.1205726381%40sss.pgh.pa.us
> 
> It's moot since we started requiring tid as a tiebreaker for btree indexes, so
> I'll just remove this.
> 
> - Consider being smarter about memory and external files used during sorts
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1196186626.4246.1078.camel@ebony.site
> 
> We've had a large number of improvements in this area since 2007, and it seems
> the ideas in this thread have mostly been done or superseded already. 

Agreed.  Please remove them or I can do it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
Next
From: Jeremy Schneider
Date:
Subject: relation OID in ReorderBufferToastReplace error message