Hi,
On 2020-11-17 12:55:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> ... ah, but I realize now that this means that we can use shared lock
> here, not exclusive, which is already an enormous improvement. That's
> because ->pgxactoff can only be changed with exclusive lock held; so as
> long as we hold shared, the array item cannot move.
Uh, wait a second. The acquisition of this lock hasn't been affected by
the snapshot scalability changes, and therefore are unrelated to
->pgxactoff changing or not.
In 13 this is:
LWLockAcquire(ProcArrayLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
MyPgXact->vacuumFlags |= PROC_IN_VACUUM;
if (params->is_wraparound)
MyPgXact->vacuumFlags |= PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND;
LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock);
Lowering this to a shared lock doesn't seem right, at least without a
detailed comment explaining why it's safe. Because GetSnapshotData() etc
look at all procs with just an LW_SHARED ProcArrayLock, changing
vacuumFlags without a lock means that two concurrent horizon
computations could come to a different result.
I'm not saying it's definitely wrong to relax things here, but I'm not
sure we've evaluated it sufficiently.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
