Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto
Date
Msg-id 20200923075744.GB7405@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Memory allocation abstraction in pgcrypto  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:00:04PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The attached removes it in favor of using palloc() et.al directly.  Is there
> any reason to keep it around still?

I doubt that anybody has been compiling with PX_OWN_ALLOC in the last
years, so let's remove this abstraction.  And +1 for your patch.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Next
From: Katsuragi Yuta
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add features to pg_stat_statements