Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0
Date
Msg-id 20200616005956.GE12121@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:46:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:07:05PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > A customer's upgrade failed, and it took me a while to
> > figure out that the problem was that they had set
> > "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age=10000" on the new cluster.
> > 
> > The consequence was that the "vacuumdb --freeze" that
> > takes place before copying commit log files failed to
> > freeze "pg_database".
> > That caused later updates to the table to fail with
> > "Could not open file "pg_xact/0000": No such file or directory."
> > 
> > I think it would increase the robustness of pg_upgrade to
> > force "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age" to 0 on the new cluster.
> 
> Wow, I can see setting "vacuum_defer_cleanup_age" to a non-zero value as
> causing big problems for pg_upgrade, and being hard to diagnose.  I will
> apply this patch to all branches.

Thank you, applied to all supported PG versions.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: language cleanups in code and docs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug?] Is the format of tables in the documentation broken in PG 13?