Re: [bug?] Is the format of tables in the documentation broken in PG 13? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [bug?] Is the format of tables in the documentation broken in PG 13?
Date
Msg-id 1267581.1592269213@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [bug?] Is the format of tables in the documentation broken in PG13?  ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com> writes:
> From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
>> That's less good.  The W3C Web Accessibility Initiative has guidance for
>> multi-level header tables which might be useful here.
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/tables/multi-level/
>> Maybe if we use the id and headers attributes we can give screen readers
>> enough clues to make sense of the information?

> Hm, I think I'll look into this.

Please do.  I looked at the referenced link a bit, but it wasn't clear
to me that they suggested anything useful to do :-(.

It'd probably be best to discuss this on the pgsql-docs list.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails if vacuum_defer_cleanup_age > 0
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: 回复:回复:how to createindex concurrently on partitioned table