Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing
Date
Msg-id 20200313070450.d7svkh4elthxayxy@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2020-03-13 14:08:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The alternative would be to detect a missing clang and emit a much more
> informative error than the current one that explicitly suggests retrying
> with
> 
>     make with_llvm=no
> 
> or setting with_llvm=no in the environment.

That, that, that's what I suggested upthread?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals