Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF
Date
Msg-id 20200122050939.GE174860@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: We're getting close to the end of 2020-01 CF  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Yeah, you're right returning them with feedback seems more appropriate,
> given the long inactivity. Plus, the CF app apparently does not allow
> moving WoA patches to the next CF anyway.

FWIW, I tend to take a base of two weeks as a sensible period of
time as that's half the CF period when I do the classification job.

> Those are the patches that have been set as WoA before this CF, and have
> not been updated since. It's quite possible the state is stale for some
> of those patches, although I've tried to check if there were any
> messages on the list.

You need to be careful about bug fixes, as these are things that we
don't want to lose track of.  Another thing that I noticed in the past
is that some patches are registered as bug fixes, but they actually
implement a new feature.  So there can be tricky cases.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions