On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:36:51PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:47 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Thanks. I have few tweaks to propose to the docs.
>>
>> + raise a PANIC-level error, aborting the recovery. Setting
>> Instead of "PANIC-level error", I would just use "PANIC error", and
>
> I have no strong opinion about this, but I used "PANIC-level error"
> because the description for data_sync_retry has already used it.
Okay. Fine with what you think is good.
>> instead of "aborting the recovery" just "crashing the server".
>
> PANIC implies server crash, so IMO "crashing the server" is
> a bit redundant, and "aborting the recovery" is better because
> "continue the recovery" is used later.
Okay. I see your point here.
> So, what about
>
> ---------------
> causes the system to ignore invalid page references in WAL records
> (but still report a warning), and continue the recovery.
> ---------------
And that sounds good to me. Switching the patch as ready for
committer.
--
Michael
