On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:45:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This seems fiddly to handle better; maybe you'd have to have a new
> PERFORM_DELETION_* flag that says to ignore "missing" objects; so when
> you go from shdepDropOwned, you pass that flag all the way down to
> doDeletion(), so the objtype-specific function is called with
> "missing_ok", and ignore if the object has already gone away. That's
> tedious because none of the Remove* functions have the concept of
> missing_ok.
Yes, that would be invasive and I'd rather not backpatch such a change
but I don't see a better or cleaner way to handle that correctly
either than the way you are describing. Looking at all the
subroutines removing the objects by OID, a patch among those lines is
repetitive, though not complicated to do.
--
Michael
