Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
Date
Msg-id 20191122133551.GA4216@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Nov-22, Antonin Houska wrote:

> I thought that in [1] you try discourage me from using pg_pread(), but now it
> seems to be the opposite. Ideally I'd like to see no overhead added by my
> patch at all, but the code simplicity should matter too.

FWIW I think the new code is buggy because it doesn't seem to be setting
ws_off, so I suppose the optimization in ReadPageInternal to skip
reading the page when it's already the page we have is not hit, except
for the first page in the segment.  I didn't verify this, just my
impression while reading the code.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP tests aren't using the magic words for Windows file access
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page