Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced
Date
Msg-id 20191107212750.GB487@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-docs
On Thu, Nov  7, 2019 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> > because we have not explained what a "virgin database" is.  
> 
> I think this is the key observation.
> 
> > We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and
> > "pristine" anyway.
> 
> empty is a lot better, but still isn't conveying the state of the database
> without there being room for interpretation.  (My grasp of the english language
> isn't enough to suggest a better alternative however).

I am thinking "pristine" would be a good word here.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a Column documentation is misleading
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced