Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
Date
Msg-id 20190724052622.GG14257@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:41:05PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:52 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess we should do that too.  I don't know how to write Perl but I'll try...
>
> Does this look about right?

Some comments from here.  I have not tested the patch.

I would recommend using TestLib::system_log instead of plain system().
The command should be a list of arguments with one element per
argument (see call of system_log in PostgresNode.pm for example).  The
indentation is incorrect, and that I would make the retry longer as I
got the feeling that on slow machines we could still have issues.  We
also usually tend to increase the timeout up to 5 minutes, and the
sleep phases make use of Time::HiRes::usleep.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Change atoi to strtol in same place
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP