Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGK0MhF0zCcDuD+jCuK-fqhn4nbri_H_nspNUD+AF0K01w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:26 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > Does this look about right?
>
> Some comments from here.  I have not tested the patch.
>
> I would recommend using TestLib::system_log instead of plain system().
> The command should be a list of arguments with one element per
> argument (see call of system_log in PostgresNode.pm for example).  The
> indentation is incorrect, and that I would make the retry longer as I
> got the feeling that on slow machines we could still have issues.  We
> also usually tend to increase the timeout up to 5 minutes, and the
> sleep phases make use of Time::HiRes::usleep.

Thanks, here's v2.


--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
Next
From: Rushabh Lathia
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs