On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:25:41PM -0400, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/21/19 9:48 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Since pg_receivewal does not apply WAL, you should not allow it to
> > > become a synchronous standby when synchronous_commit = remote_apply.
> > > If it does, it will appear to be a standby which never catches up,
> > > which may cause commits to block. To avoid this, you should either
> > > configure an appropriate value for synchronous_standby_names, or
> > > specify an application_name for pg_receivewal that does not match it,
> > > or change the value of synchronous_commit to something other than
> > > remote_apply.
> > >
> > > I think that'd be a lot more useful than enumerating the total-failure
> > > scenarios.
> >
> > +1. Thanks for the suggestions! Your wording looks good to me.
>
> +1
>
> Here is the patch for it, with Robert as the author.
> + <xref linkend="guc-synchronous-commit"/> to something other than
Looks fine to me. Just a tiny nit. For the second reference to
synchronous_commit, I would change the link to a <varname> markup.
--
Michael
